I just read this story on a TOY GUN EXCHANGE. You can read it HERE.

The trade-in program is for toy guns and you get “more family-friendly gifts“.

I guessed they would give the little boys ‘family-friendly’ DOLLS in exchange for their toy guns.  Sure as shootin’ (pun intended), dolls were one of the exchange toys.

Why don’t they give the little boys dresses and some makeup kits as well?

I may need to make my #I’MAPUSSY SHIRTS in kid’s sizes…

As I read the article, the bigger and more TROUBLING INFORMATION that was buried at the end of the story is that some of the exchange toys were given by ‘Toys for Tots’.  I’ve given many toys over the years to the organization.  I always believed that the organization was giving the donated toys to kids in need.  I didn’t realize that “TOYS FOR TOTS” is using the donated toys as part of an ANTI-SECOND AMENDMENT INDOCTRINATION PROGRAM.

Looking over their website I can’t find any information on their political stance.  It does show that their stated policy for an unacceptable toy donations is: “Toys for Tots prefers not to accept realistic looking weapons …“.  I’m okay with that policy.  It is however, a bit nebulous.  Would a toy jet fighter be unacceptable?  Would a Sopwith Camel biplane be unacceptable?  Would a toy battleship be unacceptable?  Would a toy tank be unacceptable?  Are “green army men” unacceptable?  Okay, I really don’t know where the organization stands on the Second Amendment.

From all that I can see the Toys for Tots organization is very well run and does lots of good for those in need.  Why do they need to get involved in a political agenda?   Hopefully the decision to participate in the anti-second amendment program was just a misguided local decision and not systemic to the organization as a whole.