Culture, Government, Politics

Lady Justice Is Blind Because Her Eyes Are Getting Gouged Out

Leave a comment

I’m going to make another prediction.

Watch for a book to come out titled, “The Woman Who Saved Democracy, The Christine Ford Story“, if Judge Kavanaugh is NOT confirmed to the Supreme Court. OR, watch for a book titled, “The Woman Who TRIED To Save Democracy, The Christine Ford Story“, if Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed.  It will be authored by Doc Ford and her lawyers.

All the stupid commie leftists keep blathering, “Why would Doc Ford come forward, she has nothing to gain?”

Well there’s your reason. A large percentage of commies would buy the book no matter what the outcome of the confirmation. Several million dollars in book sales is quite the motivator.  “Feel the Bern” Sanders pocketed $3,000,000 from book sales last year and I don’t even know the title of his book or know anyone who has read the book.

One of Doc Ford’s high school classmates posted on social media that everyone at her school knew about this “attempted rape”.  When the stupid classmate was told that she might need to testify under oath to this “fact”, she deleted the post and subsequently said that she has no knowledge if the incident did or did not occur.  Great corroboration.  Yet another fame and fortune seeker.

So far one big thing didn’t happen. Doc Ford’s lawyers EXPECTED the usual “pile on” of accusers, but that didn’t happen. Perhaps that’s because Judge Kavanaugh is a good man and always has been.

Let’s look at the FACTS about her story and the DEMANDS made for her testimony.

FACT Doc Ford cannot say when or where the alleged incident occurred. Her lawyers know that if she said it was at a specific TIME OR PLACE, there is a possibility that Kavanaugh might produce concrete evidence that exonerates him. Since the broad time frame is in the early to mid 1980’s lots of people had pocket 35mm cameras that DATE and TIME stamped the pictures. If someone had in their scrapbook or old photo files a picture of Kavanugh somewhere other than the alleged party there goes her credibility. One of Kavanaugh’s former girlfriends might have ticket stubs to a movies or a concert, in her old precious moments memory books, that Kavanaugh took his girlfriend to. There may be a parking or traffic ticket that would place Kavanaugh again somewhere other than the alleged party. What would you advise your book deal seeking client to say given any of those possibilities of concrete evidence? “Just say you can’t recall the time or place of the attack“.

DEMANDS. Doc Ford’s lawyers want Judge Kavanaugh to testify first. That’s a direct violation of our justice system in that Judge Kavanaugh is not allowed to face his accuser OR even to know what he is accused of. All the he can say is that whatever the Doc Ford WILL say is FALSE. He will not be able to rebut her testimony. Why is this important?

Once again Doc Ford’s lawyers want this for the book deal. First off they will say that Kavanaugh bullied her and called her a liar before she had said one word.  Smart move.  She can say any outrageous statement and he will NOT have had the opportunity to defend himself while under oath. Another smart move. They will put in their book and the FAKE NEWS will also say that,  “Kavanaugh never denied the these accusations while he was under oath”. How much airplay will that get on CNN and MSNBC? “While under oath, Kavanough did not refute that he pulled a knife on 15 year old Chrsitine, as she testified to under oath“. You get how this is going to play out in the press and how it will be written up in the book.

Forget the blindfold on Lady Justice. Let’s all just gouge her eyes out.

Culture

You Can’t Believe Everyone

Leave a comment

NOTICE, all of the following is hypothetical.  It does not represent any specific person alive or dead.  Wink wink.

No one in the “media” will say this, but I will. Not everyone should be believed just because of their gender and some claims can be dismissed without further discussion.

How much credence would you give to an accusation given the following facts:

1. The accuser has a PhD. in clinical psychology and is a professor in the field of psychology. She is supposedly trained in understanding the human mind.

2. The accuser did not recall the attack against her until a therapy session to work out problems with her marriage.

3. The accuser only recalled the attack after 30 years while in aforementioned therapy session. The accuser claims that the memory of the incident was repressed.

4. The accuser cannot recall when the attack occurred. The accuser cannot even narrow the timeline down to which year the attack occurred.

5. The accuser cannot recall where the attack occurred.

6. The accuser named an eyewitness to the attacked who categorically denies that the attack ever occurred.

7. The accuser originally made the accusation anonymously.

8. The accuser originally stated that she did not want her identity revealed beyond the anonymous letter.

9. The accuser after penning the anonymous letter hired a high powered lawyer to represent her.  I suppose everyone needs to keep a lawyer on hand.

10. The accuser again after penning the anonymous letter, had a polygraph test performed regarding her accusations.  What the heck?  Do you take a polygraph for fun?

Now the “pound me too” movement professes that ALL women who accuse men of bad acts MUST be believed. They say that it does not matter if there is factual evidence behind the accusation or not.  An ACCUSATION IS EVIDENCE in their simple minds.

Once again, I’ll say this since no one else will. Given the 10 FACTS above, I’d say the woman may believe in her own mind that the incident occurred, but the facts indicate that it didn’t.  I believe that the accuser, with coaching from her therapist, is created the delusion to justify why she has poor relationships with men.

Culture, Government, Technology

Your Watch Won’t Keep Time Next Year

Leave a comment

Here’s some news that I haven’t heard reported in the “media”.

If you own an “atomic” watch, clock, appliance, irrigation system, or any other device that keeps accurate time and is not hooked up to the Internet, it will no longer keep accurate time starting next year.

As part of the US government’s brilliant cost cutting measures they are planning to shutdown the TIME and frequency reference radio stations known as WWV, WWVH, and WWVB, which have been in operation since 1920. These stations transmit a time reference based on the National Institute of Standards’ (NIST) atomic clock which is used by many timekeeping devices. The government’s argument is that MOST timekeeping is now synchronized with GPS. Unfortunately that is PATENTLY FALSE! It’s estimated that there are at least 50 MILLION devices IN USE that depend on WWVB to maintain accurate time.

Here are some FACTS. The electronics to synchronize time to WWVB are smaller, lower power (greener), and less expensive than a GPS based solution. I have several “atomic” watches that look like regular wristwatches but they keep spectacularly accurate time, and because they are so ENERGY EFFICIENT they are powered by a built in solar cell. They require NO batteries (again greener) and NEVER need recharging (once again greener) versus something like an Apple watch which is GPS based. I have a couple of GPS based watches and they are much larger than my “atomic” watches and they require recharging every few days which is a big inconvenience.

Now how much is the government going to SAVE when they shut off service to MILLIONS of users?  Oh it’s a lot of money.  The savings will be…

$6.3 million.  That’s millions folks, NOT billions.

You can read the proposed NIST budget cuts HERE.

Once again, in all its BRILLIANCE, our CONGRESS is going to ORPHAN off a perfectly viable technology, WITHOUT TELLING US.

MILLIONS of CITIZENS CURRENTLY USE this technology but Congress WON’T fund $6.3 million because they have greater priorities such as making sure they have BILLIONS of dollars to fund some giveaway program for ILLEGALS.

“Cut services to citizens” should be their new motto.

Gotta love those politicians.

Ramblings of a maker