Category Archives: Government

Stuff you may or may not know about your local, state, and federal government

Government, Politics

Showboat and the Dimbulbs

Leave a comment

Showboat” Comey mused that he wondered how solid President Trump’s marriage was, after he revealed the existence of the Dimbulbocrat paid for “dossier” to the President. President Trump asked that Showboat investigate the unverified, salacious document, because he didn’t want even the slightest chance that his wife might think there was truth to the “dossier”.  Showboat claims his wife would never question him if a document came out with wild “pee party” allegations and the name Comey attached to it, which is why he questioned the stability of the Trump marriage.  Hello people.  The “dossier” was an official FBI document obtained by, at the time, unknown but supposedly “reliable” sources within the US intelligence community.  The “dossier” was convincing enough to bamboozle a Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act Court judge to start the investigation into President Trump and Russian collusion as well as to spy on US citizens within the borders of Our Country.  Don’t you think anyone might have at least a tiny bit of doubt if their spouse was accused of something in an official FBI document that supposedly came from “reliable” sources within the intelligence community?

Let’s not forget that Billybob LIED to Congress, UNDER OATH and was IMPEACHED for that LIE, because he felt that if he told the TRUTH that he banged the intern, his family (including his wife Hillybob) would suffer shame and ridicule. President Trump just wanted Showboat to find out where this “dossier” came from, because he knew it was a pack of lies.

In other Dimbulbocrat news,  the Dems say the DOJ Investigator General’s judgement needs to be called into question. What’s their reasoning? Because he’s only given criminal referrals implicating Clintonistas. Uh have the Dimbulbs ever considered that maybe this is because only the Hillybob wankers were the guilty ones?

Me thinks all the guilty Swamp denizens are pooping in their britches as they are all screaming, “All the illegal things we did were never supposed to see the light of day!  She wasn’t supposed to lose!”

MAGA!

Business, Government

In More Than 45 Years I’ve Never Had A Job!

Leave a comment

“I’m not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV”

After the election of President Trump in 2016 there are many legal nuances that I had no idea existed. This according to experts from the Director of the FBI, The Department of Justice, and “real” lawyers (bah humbug) on the news programs.

One of these nuances I’ve already written about. This is the notion of INTENT as a requirement to determine if I law has been violated. You can read about INTENT using “lawyer logic” HERE.  This was the INSANE logic that Showboat Comey used to defend Hillybob’s innocence in the email scandal, even though she OBVIOUSLY committed multiple FELONIES.

The next interesting nuance in the law is that written plans prior to committing a crime is not evidence of premeditation. This is the argument that the defenders of Showboat Comey use to PROVE that his writing of the Hillybob exoneration memo prior to his interviewing of her is not evidence that he “prejudged” her innocence.  Using he “Comey-protection Logic” the defenders of Counselor Showboard argue that his writing of the memo is unconnected to his months later verdict of her innocence and therefore his testimony to Congress that he did not decide her innocence prior to the completion of all interviews, IS NOT PERJURY.  Yeah, right.

Let’s follow the logic.

If we follow this lawyerly “Comey-protection Logic“,  just because a murderer had at his home a hand written shopping list that included duct tape, rope, a tarp, a hammer, and a shovel, that written list DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE PREMEDITATION even IF a body is discovered wrapped in a tarp which was tied up with rope, hands and mouth duct taped, bludgeoned with a hammer, and buried in a shallow grave. According to “Comey-protection Logic“, a document written prior an act is not proof of any PREMEDITATION or PLANNING.  “Comey-protection Logic” says, premeditation of a crime cannot exist, which implies that there can almost never be a case for First Degree Murder, which requires PREMEDITATION. The only way to charge First Degree Murder is if the defendant confesses to premeditation of the murder! This according to the logic from “Real” LAWYERS.

A third interesting nuance that the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE is presenting is that IF a lawyer only has one client, he is not a lawyer.  The DOJ is applying to this arguments as to why they are “entitled” to all documents seized from President Trump’s personal attorney Michael Cohen.  IF Cohen only has ONE client (employed soley by Donald Trump as his personal attorney) he is NOT a lawyer.  They go on to argue that if he is NOT a lawyer then NO attorney-client privilege exists. Without attorney-client privilege the DOJ believes they can use ALL seized documents as they see fit.

Once more let’s follow the logic.

Think about how this applies to corporate lawyers.  They only have one client, their employer.  The DOJ “one employer, not a lawyer logic” means that the DOJ can willy-nilly seize any corporate attorney’s documents as NO corporate lawyer can ever be a “real” lawyer.  Applying the one-employer logic to those of us who are in the great unwashed, it means that if you have only one employer, you actually are not working at the job that you think you are getting paid for.  In all my working life, I’ve ONLY had ONE employer at a time, therefore I must not have ever worked a “real” job. I can conclude in over 45 years of employment, I’ve never worked a day in my life! Sheesh I feel like quite the slacker, now that the DOJ has shown me that having only one employer makes me a “non-real” worker.

And they say those in the millennial generation are slackers.

It looks as if you charge $700 per hour and wear $5000 suits, you can say with confidence anything you want, whether is makes LOGICAL SENSE or NOT.

Okay, now I’ll say it, “All of these LAWYERS are full of SHIT!“

Culture, Government

Are You A Citizen of The United States?

Leave a comment

Is this person a citizen of the United States?

This is the controversial question that will appear on the next United States Census in 2020. You can answer three ways, by Birth (in the US, in a US territory, in any country but born to US parents), Naturalized, or No. Seems easy enough. The leftists have their panties up in a bunch with this easy question.

The House of Representatives will be holding hearings about this question because some RETARDED DEMOCRATS oppose the question. RETARDED former USAG Eric Holder is leading a lawsuit to squash this HORRIFIC question. Here in the PRK this stupid state is also suing to stop this question.

Why is the left in hysterics? They say it will be unfair because Congressional seats AND ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES are based upon the number of CITIZENS that reside in districts and somehow the CENSUS will UNDER COUNT CITIZENS. Additionally Federal funding apportioned to states is based on the number of CITIZENS in each state. Hmmm, seems to me that an accurate count of CITIZENS would be useful. How do they do it now? They ESTIMATE how many CITIZENS reside in each state.

The argument is that this CITIZENSHIP question is designed to decrease representation and funding in states with large numbers of ILLEGAL aliens. The intelligentsia of these bastions of sanctuary policies are arguing that CITIZENS who live with or in IMMIGRANT households will be afraid of giving information to the government and these states will lose Federal dollars and voting power.

Okay, how many CITIZENS will be AFRAID to answer YES? How many LEGAL IMMIGRANTS will be AFRAID to answer NO? I’d say about ZERO in each CATEGORY. How many ILLEGAL ALIENS would answer NO? This is where it gets questionable.

Now some Constitutional background. ILLEGAL ALIENS have already broken FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS. They are NOT entitled to FEDERAL REPRESENTATION in government NOR are they entitled to FEDERAL FUNDING.

An ILLEGAL ALIEN can answer TRUTHFULLY which would be NO, or they can FALSELY claim that they are a United States CITIZEN. The count for representation purposes can only be HIGHER than the TRUE number! Why would the left be upset with this? Sound puzzling? The question can legally ONLY HELP states with large ILLEGAL ALIEN populations.

What’s the penalty if an ILLEGAL ALIEN were to FALSELY answer the CITIZENSHIP question? The fine is $100. Of course first they would need to catch the ILLEGAL and then PROVE that they perjured their answer. I’m fairly certain that the Commerce Department won’t be cross checking every ILLEGAL arrested with how they answered the CENSUS. I did a quick search and HOW MANY people have EVER been prosecuted for violating the CENSUS law? How about ZERO, nada, no one. Not one person has ever been fined for violating the CENSUS LAW!

In 2012 the Orange County (Calif.) Register reported, ” … quoting a bureau spokeswoman, Jennifer Smits, saying that nobody had been fined for failing to participate to date. By telephone, bureau spokeswoman Stacy Gimbel Vidal told us that remains so; no fines have been levied. The bureau, she said, is ‘really not in the business of prosecuting people who don’t comply.’ ”

To recap, the CENSUS can only FALSELY COUNT a higher number of CITIZENS. The CENSUS CANNOT UNDER COUNT CITIZENS.

The only conclusion we can draw from this drama is that the ESTIMATES of CITIZENS in sanctuary states is MUCH HIGHER than the actual number of CITIZENS and those in power KNOW THIS and want to maintain their unfair representation in CONGRESS and the ELECTORAL College as well as continuing to STEAL taxpayer money.

Taking a line from Al Gore, “An inconvenient TRUTH“.