I have a proposal to solve the increase in crime in major cities.
DEDUCT from the city leaders, mayor, city council members, and district attorney, a percentage of their TOTAL COMPENSATION (salary, medical, retirement) based on the increase in the rate of crime.
For example, if the crime rate increases by 25%, the leaders’ COMPENSATIONS are cut 25%. If the crime rate increases by 100%, the leaders receive NOTHING. If the crime rate increases beyond 100% the leaders must pay the city the a percentage of their SALARIES beyond 100%. For example, if the crime rate increases to 115%, each leader receives NO COMPENSATION PACKAGE and must pay 15% of THEIR OWN MONEY to the city. The converse is true as well. If the crime rate is reduced by 25%, the leaders will receive 25% higher SALARIES. How would the bonuses be funded you ask? Take the money from the expenditures for their personal security details. This gives them an additional INCENTIVE to make sure the cities are SAFE.
That should get their FAT ASSES off the couch and get them to actually perform the function of government.
“For make no mistake, bullies and merchants of fear, peddlers of lies are threatening the very foundation of our country. It gives me no pleasure to say this. I never thought in my entire career I’d ever have to say it. But I swore an oath to you, to God to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. That’s an oath that forms a sacred trust to defend America against all threats, both foreign and domestic. The assault on free and fair elections is just such a threat, literally. I’ve said it before. We’re facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. That’s not hyperbole, since the Civil War. The Confederates back then never breached the Capitol as insurrectionist did on January the sixth.”, President Joe Biden, July 13, 2021, referring to the action of the Texas Legislature to pass the state’s voting reform law.
Here’s a suggestion to the power mad Uniter in Chief, if you ACTUALLY believe that the Texas law is an ASSAULT against DEMOCRACY as you state, and you recognize these actions as an ASSAULT and that’s “NOT HYPERBOLE”, you need to IMMEDIATELY send in the MILITARY to put down the INSURRECTION led by the Texas Legislature and the overwhelming majority of Texans who want voting reform. You will go down in history as the modern day Abraham Lincoln, freeing the black man from the voting bondage of the Texas plantation owners.
You stated that you “SWORE AN OATH… TO GOD … TO DEFEND AMERICA AGAINST ALL THREATS BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC“. As El Presidente you have the CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY and MORAL OBLIGATION to KILL all Texans who don’t agree with you.
As you stated in your speech on June 23, 2021, about insurrectionists, you as president can use “F-15’s And Maybe Some Nuclear Weapons” against those who oppose your reign.
And those are your words, NOT HYPERBOLE.
Mr. President, you’re a Fucking IDIOT.
After the RIOTS in the summer of 2020, a movement began to “Defund the police“. Stupid mayors and governors, most of whom are Dimbulbcrats, capitulated to the demands of the mobs and cut funding for their police forces. The result was an INCREASE in violent crimes. Murders, rapes, and robberies jumped by double and triple digit percentages in these utopian cities run by Dimbulbcrat MORONS.
Now the Dims are starting to realize that HIGHER CRIME RATES is not a winning platform to run on. What is their solution? Blame the defunding of the police and resulting increases in crime on REPUBLICANS. Nice pivot.
The argument is that REPUBLICAN senators would not pass the original, MULTI-TRILLION dollar, pork filled bill which was called an INFRASTRUCTURE BILL. There was some vague wording in the bill about money allocated to law enforcement for things such as bodycams. As the bill had no possibility of passing as it had almost nothing to do with infrastructure the Dims are using this failure to say the Republicans defunded the police. This is of course absolutely ludicrous. The whacky presidential press secretary, Jen “Ginger” Psaki said this was the case when asked about the “defund the police” movement. She said, “[Republicans]… stood in the way of crucial funding needed to prevent the laying off of police officers as crimes increase. That’s a simple statement of fact.“
Let’s for arguments sake assume “Ginger” is correct and that Republicans hate the police and don’t want to give them money. Riddle me this, WHY is it that when LOCAL Dimbulbcrat politicians cut funding for their police it becomes the responsibility of the FEDERAL government to give money to cities and states when the LOCAL Dims want to put funding back for the police? Why don’t they just restore the budgets that they cut (the money was already allocated)? Why should TAXPAYERS in cities and states who DIDN’T DEFUND THEIR POLICE pay for the stupid decisions of mayors in OTHER STATES?
The policy seems to be, “If YOU do something stupid in YOUR city, people in OTHER cities and states need to PAY for YOUR stupidity.”
Democracy in action.